Calculus — Estimating Instantaneous Rate of Change from a Table Corrected lesson transcript ## 0:00 — Estimating Instantaneous Rate from a Table [0:04] Water is flowing into a pool. Its volume was recorded at five different times. [0:14] I want to estimate the instantaneous rate of change at the 20 minute mark [0:32] So this is volume, and this is time. [0:48] Water is flowing in, so volume is a continuous function. Would this be continuous? [0:55] Yes. The volume would not instantly jump; it changes steadily. [1:03] We do not know what the function looks like. [1:14] It could look something like this, but we do not know. It would probably be a smooth [1:24] function like that. ## 1:29 — Instantaneous Rate as a Tangent Slope [1:29] We're trying to find the instantaneous rate of change which is the slope of what? [1:41] At one point, it is the tangent line. [1:49] Right at the 20 minute mark. [1:52] We're trying to guess the slope of that line right here. [2:01] Why can't we do what we did on Friday? [2:07] Why can't we just pick values really, really close and find the average rate of change? [2:19] It's asking for the instantaneous rate of change. [2:23] It's definitely asking for that. [2:25] But last class, we did this, like the average rate of change. ## 2:36 — Why the Formula-Based Method Is Unavailable [2:36] For example, we used the average rate of change [f(2.99) − f(3)] / (2.99 − 3). [2:47] Then we kept using numbers [2:49] that get closer and closer to the target. [2:51] Remember this? [2:52] OK. [2:53] So why can't we do that for this problem? [3:06] And what do we not have here? [3:09] We have no equation [3:12] To use that method, we would need to be given [3:17] a function formula such as f(x) = … [3:21] But we do not know what the formula is. [3:25] So here we can't do this method where you keep plugging in numbers closer and closer [3:32] to that number. [3:33] Does this make sense? [3:35] Okay. [3:36] So we need some other way to estimate it. ## 3:42 — Use Secant Slopes on Both Sides [3:42] So we find the average rate of change between these two, and that would give us the slope [3:50] of that line. [3:52] And then do the same thing between 20 and 25, which would give us the slope of that [4:04] line. Then what should we do with the two slopes? Average them. [4:20] One possible—but less reliable—idea is to draw the tangent line we expect and then [4:32] use the known point plus a second estimated point. That would still be a guess, [4:39] so it is better to use the table data. That is what we will [4:42] do. First, find the average rate of change on the interval [15, 20]. ## 4:58 — Compute the Neighboring Average Rates [4:58] AROC on [15, 20] = (3,500 − 2,500) / (20 − 15). [5:07] That is 200. [5:11] Is that 200? [5:14] Okay. [5:15] What are the units? [5:17] The volume values are measured in gallons, and the time values are [5:26] measured in minutes, so the units are gallons per minute. [5:35] The slope of the green line is 200 gallons per minute. [5:48] Is that 300? [5:56] The slope of the orange line is 300 gallons per minute. ## 6:18 — Average the Two Rate Estimates [6:18] Okay. We found the first slope, 200 gallons per minute, and then [6:47] the orange slope, 300 gallons per minute. Our best estimate [6:58] is the average of those two slopes. [7:15] We are estimating the instantaneous rate of change at one single point in time—20 minutes—not over an interval [7:25] of time. At that exact moment, our best estimate is (200 + 300) / 2 = 250 gallons per minute. ## 7:38 — When to Use This Method [7:38] This method is not very complicated. [7:48] So when are we going to do this method? [7:49] Use this method when only a table or graph of values is given. [7:53] Use it when no function formula is available. If a function or equation is given, use [8:02] the method from Friday: find average rates over increasingly small intervals. Does that make sense? [8:11] Okay